http://www.powerqa.org/qa/tag/security Powered by PowerQA http://www.powerqa.org/qa/1015/what-do-you-think-of-this-change <a href="https://github.com/q2a/question2answer/pull/457" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/q2a/question2answer/pull/457</a><br /> <br /> Certainly, it is common routine. But, I think security strength is reduced a little. Normally, Gideon do not make redundant interface. There might be different meaning to make such a redundant view.<br /> <br /> Since password remineder is most targeted from crackers, I would not reflect that changes into PowerQA. Core http://www.powerqa.org/qa/1015/what-do-you-think-of-this-change Wed, 26 Oct 2016 05:30:39 +0000 http://www.powerqa.org/qa/826/do-you-think-this-modification-is-needed <a href="http://www.question2answer.org/qa/50886/q2a-1-7-4-security-release" rel="nofollow">http://www.question2answer.org/qa/50886/q2a-1-7-4-security-release</a><br /> <br /> <a href="https://github.com/q2a/question2answer/commit/fd628cf33ad71be01f3c9b7b144e5a5f53d9e57d" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/q2a/question2answer/commit/fd628cf33ad71be01f3c9b7b144e5a5f53d9e57d</a><br /> <br /> There is no description about vulnerability in Scott post. Therefore, I can not understand the need for this change.<br /> <br /> Is it really this is necessary? ? ? Core http://www.powerqa.org/qa/826/do-you-think-this-modification-is-needed Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:04:15 +0000